Back to Search Start Over

Quantitative 2-Dimensionsal Digital Subtraction Venography for Venous Interventions: Validation in Phantom and In Vivo Porcine Models.

Authors :
Periyasamy S
Oberstar EL
Whitehead JF
Kutlu AZ
Pieper AA
Hoffman CA
Li G
Brace CL
Speidel MA
Laeseke PF
Source :
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR [J Vasc Interv Radiol] 2024 Sep; Vol. 35 (9), pp. 1367-1376.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of using a 2-dimensional quantitative digital subtraction venography (qDSV) technique that employs a temporally modulated contrast medium injection to quantify blood velocity in phantom, normal, and stenotic porcine iliac vein models.<br />Materials and Methods: Blood velocity was calculated using qDSV following temporally modulated pulsed injections of iodinated contrast medium and compared with Doppler ultrasound (US) measurements (phantom, in-line sensor; in vivo, diagnostic linear probe). Phantom evaluation was performed in a compliant polyethylene tube phantom with simulated venous flow. In vivo evaluation of qDSV was performed in normal (n = 7) and stenotic (n = 3) iliac vein models. Stenoses were created using endovenous radiofrequency ablation, and blood velocities were determined at baseline, after stenosis, after venoplasty, and after stent placement.<br />Results: In the phantom model, qDSV-calculated blood velocities (12-50 cm/s) had very strong correlations with US-measured velocities (13-51 cm/s) across a range of baseline blood velocities and injection protocols (slope, 1.01-1.13; R <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.96-0.99). qDSV velocities were similar to US velocities regardless of injection method: (a) custom injector, (b) commercial injector, or (c) hand injection. In the normal in vivo model, qDSV-calculated velocities (5-18 cm/s) had strong correlation (slope, 1.22; R <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0.90) with US-measured velocities (3-20 cm/s). In the stenosis model, blood velocities at baseline, after stenosis, after venoplasty, and after stent placement were similar on qDSV and US at all time points.<br />Conclusions: Venous blood velocity was accurately quantified in a venous phantom and in vivo porcine models using qDSV. Intraprocedural changes in porcine iliac vein blood velocity were quantified with qDSV after creation of a stenosis and subsequently treating it with venoplasty and stent placement.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-7732
Volume :
35
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38906246
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2024.06.008