Back to Search
Start Over
Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device.
- Source :
-
Biomedical physics & engineering express [Biomed Phys Eng Express] 2024 Jul 16; Vol. 10 (5). Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 16. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose/Objective . Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification. Material/Methods . Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 × 10 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 5 × 5 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 4 × 4 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 3 × 3 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 2 × 2 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 1 × 1 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 0.5 × 0.5 cm <superscript>2</superscript> ) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines. Results . When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%. Conclusion . EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.<br /> (Creative Commons Attribution license.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2057-1976
- Volume :
- 10
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Biomedical physics & engineering express
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38906125
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e