Nutrients removal in overloaded WWTP by intermittently aerated IFAS: Effects of biofilm carrier and intermittent aeration cycle.

Updating of the current Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC) will demand stricter regulations for nutrients removal. In this frame, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) of small-to-medium potential will face new challenges for achieving process intensification. Integrating intermittent aeration (IA) and integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) technologies could be a promising solution to meet such requirements. This study analyzed how IA cycles affected nutrients removal in IFAS reactors with different biofilm carriers (e.g., plastic and sponge media). The plants responses to different carbon/nitrogen/phosphorous (C/N/P) ratios were evaluated while operating under low sludge retention time (SRT) to simulate overloaded conditions. A short IA cycle (1 h) with an aeration/not aeration ratio of 2:1 enabled high organic carbon and nitrification performances when operating at high C/N/P (11.8/1/1), whereas low denitrification and phosphorous removal yields were obtained because of the short not-aerated phase. Decreasing C/N ratio (8.8/1/1) without changing the IA cycle resulted in nitrification worsening because of the reduced metabolic kinetics of biofilm. Under such load conditions, a higher IA cycle (2 h) was necessary to improve process performance. A longer not-aerated phase was also positive for denitrification and phosphorous removal because of the establishment of anoxic and anaerobic environments within the bulk and inner biofilm layers. Besides, results suggested that sponge carriers offered advantages over plastic ones, enabling a higher biofilm retention capacity, better nutrient removal, as well as robustness and resilience to operating condition changes. This would result in simpler management systems for implementing the IA process, thus reducing process complexity and costs.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)