Back to Search Start Over

The influence of threat on visuospatial perception, affordances, and protective behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
MacIntyre E
Pinto E
Mouatt B
Henry ML
Lamb C
Braithwaite FA
Meulders A
Stanton TR
Source :
Clinical psychology review [Clin Psychol Rev] 2024 Aug; Vol. 112, pp. 102449. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 03.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Perception has been conceptualised as an active and adaptive process, based upon incoming sensory inputs, which are modified by top-down factors such as cognitions. Visuospatial perception is thought to be scaled based on threat, with highly threatening objects or contexts visually inflated to promote escape or avoidance behaviours. This meta-analytical systematic review quantified the effect and evidence quality of threat-evoked visuospatial scaling, as well as how visuospatial scaling relates to affordances (perceived action capabilities) and behavioural avoidance/escape outcomes. Databases and grey literature were systematically searched inclusive to 10/04/24. Studies were assessed with a customised Risk of Bias form and meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. 12,354 records were identified. Of these, 49 experiments (n = 3027) were included in the review. There was consistent evidence that threat the of height influenced contextual perception (g = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.88) and affordances (g = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.84, -0.03). Threatening objects were viewed as larger (g = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.26, 1.26) and as closer (g = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.42). Bodily threat (pain) yielded conflicting effects on visuospatial perception/affordances. We conclude that threat may influence visuospatial perception and affordances. However, since behavioural measures were poorly reported, their relationship with visuospatial perception/affordances remains elusive.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BM receives remuneration from Noigroup for the provision of continuing professional development workshops related to pain science education. FAB has received speaker fees for providing lectures relating to pain and blinding in clinical trials. TRS receives book royalties and speaker fees for lectures relating to pain and rehabilitation. EM, EP, MLH, AM, and CL have nothing to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-7811
Volume :
112
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical psychology review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38901066
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102449