Back to Search Start Over

[Spatio-temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage in Huaibei City Based on InVEST-PLUS Model].

Authors :
Yu ZL
Zhao MS
Gao YF
Wang T
Zhao ZD
Wang SH
Source :
Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue [Huan Jing Ke Xue] 2024 Jun 08; Vol. 45 (6), pp. 3270-3283.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the impact of spatiotemporal changes in land use on ecosystem carbon storage. The study analyzed the spatiotemporal changes in carbon storage in the study area based on land use data from five periods (1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2020) using the InVEST model. The PLUS model was used to predict land use changes in the study area under four different scenarios (natural development, farmland protection, ecological protection, and double protection of farmland and ecology) in 2035, and the ecosystem carbon storage under different scenarios was estimated. The results of the study indicated that the farmland in the area under investigation had been decreasing consistently from 1985 to 2020, with a more rapid rate of change observed between 2015 and 2020. During this period, the overall dynamic attitude towards land use reached 34.62 %. Additionally, the carbon storage in the area showed a decreasing trend over the years, with a decrease of 1.55×10 <superscript>5</superscript> t from 1985 to 2020. Between 2005 and 2015, the carbon storage showed a decrease of 1.22×10 <superscript>5</superscript> t, with an average annual decrease of 1.22×10 <superscript>4</superscript> t. The areas with higher carbon storage were located in the eastern part of the study area, whereas areas with lower carbon storage were found in the central and northwestern parts. Although the proportion of carbon storage in farmland decreased from 66.89 % to 57.73 %, farmland remained the most important carbon pool in the study area. The conversion of other land use types to grassland and forestland was advantageous for increasing ecosystem carbon storage. Finally, the study projected that by 2035, the carbon storage in the natural development scenario, the farmland protection scenario, the ecological protection scenario, and the dual protection scenario would be 81.77×10 <superscript>5</superscript> , 82.45×10 <superscript>5</superscript> , 82.82×10 <superscript>5</superscript> , and 82.51×10 <superscript>5</superscript> t, respectively.

Details

Language :
Chinese
ISSN :
0250-3301
Volume :
45
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38897750
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202306110