Back to Search Start Over

Improved Positron Emission Tomography Quantification: Evaluation of a Maximum-Likelihood Scatter Scaling Algorithm.

Authors :
Overbeck N
Ahangari S
Conti M
Panin V
Azam A
Kurbegovic S
Kjær A
Højgaard L
Korsholm K
Fischer BM
Andersen FL
Andersen TL
Source :
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) [Diagnostics (Basel)] 2024 May 22; Vol. 14 (11). Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 22.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Incorrect scatter scaling of positron emission tomography (PET) images can lead to halo artifacts, quantitative bias, or reconstruction failure. Tail-fitted scatter scaling (TFSS) possesses performance limitations in multiple cases. This study aims to investigate a novel method for scatter scaling: maximum-likelihood scatter scaling (MLSS) in scenarios where TFSS tends to induce artifacts or are observed to cause reconstruction abortion. [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-RGD PET scans of nine patients were included in cohort 1 in the scope of investigating the reduction of halo artifacts relative to the scatter estimation method. PET scans of 30 patients administrated with [ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga]Ga-uPAR were included in cohort 2, used for an evaluation of the robustness of MLSS in cases where TFSS-integrated reconstructions are observed to fail. A visual inspection of MLSS-corrected images scored higher than TFSS-corrected reconstructions of cohort 1. The quantitative investigation near the bladder showed a relative difference in tracer uptake of up to 94.7%. A reconstruction of scans included in cohort 2 resulted in failure in 23 cases when TFSS was used. The lesion uptake values of cohort 2 showed no significant difference. MLSS is suggested as an alternative scatter-scaling method relative to TFSS with the aim of reducing halo artifacts and a robust reconstruction process.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2075-4418
Volume :
14
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38893602
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14111075