ChatGPT and Clinical Questions on the Practical Guideline of Blepharoptosis: Reply.

In a recent Letter to the Editor authored by Daungsupawong et al. in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, titled "ChatGPT and Clinical Questions on the Practical Guideline of Blepharoptosis: Correspondence," the authors emphasized important points regarding the input language differences between input and output references. However, advanced versions, such as GPT-4, have shown marginal differences between English and Chinese inputs, possibly because of the use of larger training data. To address this issue, non-English-language-oriented large language models (LLMs) have been developed. The ability of LLMs to refer to existing references varies, with newer models, such as GPT-4, showing higher reference rates than GPT-3.5. Future research should focus on addressing the current limitations and enhancing the effectiveness of emerging LLMs in providing accurate and informative answers to medical questions across multiple languages.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
(© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)