Back to Search Start Over

Initiating immunoglobulin replacement therapy helps reduce severe infections and shifts healthcare resource utilization to outpatient services among US patients with inborn errors of immunity.

Authors :
Riaz F
Umashankar K
Marchlewicz EH
Zhang K
Khandelwal N
Sanchirico M
Source :
Journal of medical economics [J Med Econ] 2024 Jan-Dec; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 849-857. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims: Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are predisposed to severe recurrent/chronic infections, and often require hospitalization, resulting in substantial burden to patients/healthcare systems. While immunoglobulin replacement therapies (IgRTs) are the standard first-line treatment for most forms of IEI, limited real-world data exist regarding clinical characteristics and treatment costs for patients with IEI initiating such treatment. This retrospective analysis examined infection and treatment characteristics in US patients with IEI initiating IgRT with immune globulin infusion (human), 10% (IG10%). Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs before and after treatment initiation were compared. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19 on infection diagnoses was evaluated.<br />Methods: Patients with IEI initiating IG10% between July 2012 and August 2019 were selected from Merative MarketScan Databases using diagnosis/prescription codes. Patients were followed 6 months before and after first IG10% claim date. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Treatment characteristics and HCRU before and after IG10% initiation were compared. Infection diagnoses during 2020 and 2019 (March-December) were compared.<br />Results: The study included 1,497 patients with IEI diagnoses (mean age = 43.4 years) initiating IG10%, with frequently reported comorbidities like asthma (32.1%). Following IG10% initiation, fewer severe infection diagnoses (11.6% vs 19.9%), fewer infection-related inpatient (10.8% vs 19.5%) and outpatient services (71.6% vs 79.9%), and lower infection-related total healthcare costs ($7,849 vs $13,995; p  < 0.001)-driven by lower inpatient costs ($2,746 vs $9,900)-were observed than before. Fewer patients had infection diagnoses during COVID-19 (22.8%) than the prior year (31.2%).<br />Conclusion: Patients with IEI are susceptible to severe infections leading to high disease burden and treatment costs. Following IG10% initiation, we observed fewer infections, lower infection-related treatment costs, and shift in care (inpatient to outpatient) leading to significant cost savings. Among patients with IEI, 27% fewer infection diagnoses were observed during the early COVID-19 lockdown period than the prior year.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-837X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of medical economics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38885115
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2368987