Back to Search Start Over

Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients.

Authors :
Saleh M
Pascual F
Ghallab M
Wu AGR
Chin KM
Ratti F
Giglio MC
Garatti M
Nghia PP
Kato Y
Lim C
Herman P
Coelho FF
Schmelzle M
Pratschke J
Aghayan DL
Liu Q
Marino MV
Belli A
Chiow AKH
Sucandy I
Ivanecz A
Di Benedetto F
Choi SH
Lee JH
Park JO
Prieto M
Guzman Y
Fondevila C
Efanov M
Rotellar F
Choi GH
Robles-Campos R
Kadam P
Sutcliffe RP
Troisi RI
Tang CN
Chong CC
D'Hondt M
Dalla Valle B
Ruzzenente A
Kingham TP
Scatton O
Liu R
Mejia A
Mishima K
Wakabayashi G
Lopez-Ben S
Wang X
Ferrero A
Ettorre GM
Vivarelli M
Mazzaferro V
Giuliante F
Yong CC
Yin M
Monden K
Geller D
Chen KH
Sugioka A
Edwin B
Cheung TT
Long TCD
Abu Hilal M
Aldrighetti L
Soubrane O
Fuks D
Han HS
Cherqui D
Goh BKP
Source :
Annals of surgical oncology [Ann Surg Oncol] 2024 Sep; Vol. 31 (9), pp. 5615-5630. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 15.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the increasing widespread adoption and experience in minimally invasive liver resections (MILR), open conversion occurs not uncommonly even with minor resections and as been reported to be associated with inferior outcomes. We aimed to identify risk factors for and outcomes of open conversion in patients undergoing minor hepatectomies. We also studied the impact of approach (laparoscopic or robotic) on outcomes.<br />Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of 20,019 patients who underwent RLR and LLR across 50 international centers between 2004-2020. Risk factors for and perioperative outcomes of open conversion were analysed. Multivariate and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to control for confounding factors.<br />Results: Finally, 10,541 patients undergoing either laparoscopic (LLR; 89.1%) or robotic (RLR; 10.9%) minor liver resections (wedge resections, segmentectomies) were included. Multivariate analysis identified LLR, earlier period of MILR, malignant pathology, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, previous abdominal surgery, larger tumor size, and posterosuperior location as significant independent predictors of open conversion. The most common reason for conversion was technical issues (44.7%), followed by bleeding (27.2%), and oncological reasons (22.3%). After propensity score matching (PSM) of baseline characteristics, patients requiring open conversion had poorer outcomes compared with successful MILR cases as evidenced by longer operative times, more blood loss, higher requirement for perioperative transfusion, longer duration of hospitalization and higher morbidity, reoperation, and 90-day mortality rates.<br />Conclusions: Multiple risk factors were associated with conversion of MILR even for minor hepatectomies, and open conversion was associated with significantly poorer perioperative outcomes.<br /> (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-4681
Volume :
31
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38879668
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15498-0