Indicator and pathogenic virus removal in bench scale soil aquifer treatment.

The demonstration of enteric virus removal for indirect potable reuse of advanced purified water is necessary to ensure safe water reclamation practices. This study evaluated the efficacy of soil treatment in reducing concentrations of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV), Hepatitis A (HAV), and Norovirus (NoV) gene markers through bench scale unsaturated soil columns. Three different infiltration rates were evaluated to determine their impact on viral gene marker removal. The concentrations of viral markers in the column influent and effluent samples were measured through RNA extraction and then RT-qPCR, and the log reduction values (LRVs) were calculated to quantify the effectiveness of removal across the columns. The LRVs achieved for PMMoV were 2.80 ± 0.36, 2.91 ± 0.48, and 2.72 ± 0.32 for infiltration rates of 4.9 mm/h, 9.4 mm/h, and 14.0 mm/h, respectively. A one-way ANOVA indicated no statistically significant differences in LRVs among the various infiltration rates (p-value = 0.329). All samples measured for HAV were below the detection limit both in the influent and effluent of the soil columns. While NoV GI and GII markers were measurable in the soil column influent, they were removed to below the detection limit in the effluent. The use of half the Limit-of-Detection (LoD) for effluent values enabled the estimation of log removals, which were calculated as 1.42 ± 0.07, 1.64 ± 0.29, and 1.74 ± 0.18 for NoV GI and 1.14 ± 0.19, 1.58 ± 0.21, and 1.87 ± 0.41 for NoV GII at infiltration rates of 4.9 mm/h, 9.4 mm/h, and 14.0 mm/h. This highlights the efficacy of soil treatment in reducing virus gene marker concentrations at various infiltration rates, and that spreading basins employed for reclaimed water recharge to ground water aquifers are an effective method for reducing the presence of viral contaminants in indirect potable reuse systems.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)