Back to Search Start Over

Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Authors :
Ollitrault P
Chaumont C
Font J
Manninger M
Conti S
Matusik PT
Mulder BA
Ferchaud V
Pellissier A
Al Khoury M
Milliez P
Champ-Rigot L
Anselme F
Source :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2024 Jul 02; Vol. 26 (7).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims: Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation.<br />Methods and Results: One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred.<br />Conclusion: SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.O. received consulting fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. M.M. received speaker fees/honoraria from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Amomed, AOP Orphan, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, and BMS/Pfizer and research grants from Biosense Webster and Abbott. S.C. received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott and Boston Scientific. P.M. received consulting fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific. L.C.-R. received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Microport CRM. F.A. received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Microport CRM, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2092
Volume :
26
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38875490
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae160