Back to Search
Start Over
Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.
- Source :
-
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2024 Jul 02; Vol. 26 (7). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aims: Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation.<br />Methods and Results: One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred.<br />Conclusion: SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.O. received consulting fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. M.M. received speaker fees/honoraria from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Amomed, AOP Orphan, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, and BMS/Pfizer and research grants from Biosense Webster and Abbott. S.C. received consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott and Boston Scientific. P.M. received consulting fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific. L.C.-R. received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Microport CRM. F.A. received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Microport CRM, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Aged
Treatment Outcome
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Veins surgery
Cardiac Catheters
Equipment Design
Phrenic Nerve injuries
Atrial Fibrillation surgery
Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation physiopathology
Catheter Ablation methods
Catheter Ablation instrumentation
Feasibility Studies
Vena Cava, Superior surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2092
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38875490
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae160