Effects of activity-oriented physiotherapy with and without eye movement training on dynamic balance, functional mobility, and eye movements in patients with Parkinson's disease: An assessor-blinded randomised controlled pilot trial.

Objectives: To describe changes in balance, walking speed, functional mobility, and eye movements following an activity-oriented physiotherapy (AOPT) or its combination with eye movement training (AOPT-E) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). To explore the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Methods: Using an assessor-blinded pilot RCT, 25 patients with PD were allocated to either AOPT or AOPT-E. Supervised interventions were performed 30 minutes, 4x/weekly, for 4 weeks, alongside inpatient rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention, including dynamic balance, walking speed, functional and dual-task mobility, ability to safely balance, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, and eye movements (number/duration of fixations) using a mobile eye tracker. Freezing of gait (FOG), and falls-related self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 4-week follow-up. Effect sizes of 0.10 were considered weak, 0.30 moderate, and ≥0.50 strong. Feasibility was assessed using predefined criteria: recruitment, retention and adherence rates, adverse events, falls, and post-intervention acceptability using qualitative interviews.
Results: Improvements were observed in dynamic balance (effect size r = 0.216-0.427), walking speed (r = 0.165), functional and dual-task mobility (r = 0.306-0.413), ability to safely balance (r = 0.247), HRQoL (r = 0.024-0.650), and depression (r = 0.403). Falls-related self-efficacy (r = 0.621) and FOG (r = 0.248) showed varied improvements, partly sustained at follow-up. Eye movement improvements were observed after AOPT-E only. Feasibility analysis revealed that recruitment was below target, with less than two patients recruited per month due to COVID-19 restrictions. Feasibility targets were met, with a retention rate of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.68-99.79) and a 98.18% (95% CI: 96.12-99.20) adherence rate, exceeding the targets of 80% and 75%, respectively. One adverse event unrelated to the study intervention confirmed intervention safety, and interview data indicated high intervention acceptability.
Conclusions: AOPT-E and AOPT appeared to be effective in patients with PD. Feasibility of a larger RCT was confirmed and is needed to validate results.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Mildner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)