Back to Search Start Over

Comparative analysis of different surgical approaches for recurrent inguinal hernia: a single-center observational study.

Authors :
Choi MJ
Lee KS
Oh HK
Ahn SH
Ahn HM
Shin HR
Lee TG
Jo MH
Kim DW
Kang SB
Source :
Annals of surgical treatment and research [Ann Surg Treat Res] 2024 Jun; Vol. 106 (6), pp. 330-336. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 30.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Managing recurrent inguinal hernias is complex, and choosing the right surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open) is vital for patient outcomes. This study compared the outcomes of using the same vs. different surgical approaches for initial and subsequent hernia repairs.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between January 2014 and May 2023. Patients were divided into the "concordant" and "discordant" groups, comprising patients who underwent same and different approaches in both surgeries, respectively. Preoperative baseline characteristics, index surgery data, postoperative outcomes, and recurrence rates were analyzed and compared.<br />Results: In total, 131 patients were enrolled; the concordant and discordant groups comprised 31 (open, n = 19; laparoscopic, n = 12) and 100 patients (open to laparoscopic, n = 68; laparoscopic to open, n = 32), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the mean operation time (50.5 ± 21.7 minutes vs. 50.2 ± 20.0 minutes, P = 0.979), complication rates (6.5% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.356), or 36-month cumulative recurrence rates (9.8% vs. 9.8%; P = 0.865). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the discordant than in the concordant group (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6, P = 0.003).<br />Conclusion: Most recurrent inguinal hernia repairs were performed using the discordant surgical approach. Overall, concordance in the surgical approach did not significantly affect postoperative outcomes. Therefore, the selection of the surgical approach based on the patient's condition and surgeon's preference may be advisable.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Duck-Woo Kim, serving as the Editor-in-Chief of Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, did not participate in the review process of this article. No other potential conflicts of interest pertinent to this article were reported.<br /> (Copyright © 2024, the Korean Surgical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2288-6575
Volume :
106
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgical treatment and research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38868581
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.6.330