Back to Search Start Over

Equity in the Setting of Heart Failure Diagnosis: An Analysis of Differences Between and Within Clinician Practices.

Authors :
Gupta A
Tisdale RL
Calma J
Stafford RS
Maron DJ
Hernandez-Boussard T
Ambrosy AP
Heidenreich PA
Sandhu AT
Source :
Circulation. Heart failure [Circ Heart Fail] 2024 Jun; Vol. 17 (6), pp. e010718. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Timely heart failure (HF) diagnosis can lead to earlier intervention and reduced morbidity. Among historically marginalized patients, new-onset HF diagnosis is more likely to occur in acute care settings (emergency department or inpatient hospitalization) than outpatient settings. Whether inequity within outpatient clinician practices affects diagnosis settings is unknown.<br />Methods: We determined the setting of incident HF diagnosis among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between 2013 and 2017. We identified sociodemographic and medical characteristics associated with HF diagnosis in the acute care setting. Within each outpatient clinician practice, we compared acute care diagnosis rates across sociodemographic characteristics: female versus male sex, non-Hispanic White versus other racial and ethnic groups, and dual Medicare-Medicaid eligible (a surrogate for low income) versus nondual-eligible patients. Based on within-practice differences in acute diagnosis rates, we stratified clinician practices by equity (high, intermediate, and low) and compared clinician practice characteristics.<br />Results: Among 315 439 Medicare patients with incident HF, 173 121 (54.9%) were first diagnosed in acute care settings. Higher adjusted acute care diagnosis rates were associated with female sex (6.4% [95% CI, 6.1%-6.8%]), American Indian (3.6% [95% CI, 1.1%-6.1%]) race, and dual eligibility (4.1% [95% CI, 3.7%-4.5%]). These differences persisted within clinician practices. With clinician practice adjustment, dual-eligible patients had a 4.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-5.4%) greater acute care diagnosis rate than nondual-eligible patients. Clinician practices with greater equity across dual eligibility also had greater equity across sex and race and ethnicity and were more likely to be composed of predominantly primary care clinicians.<br />Conclusions: Differences in HF diagnosis rates in the acute care setting between and within clinician practices highlight an opportunity to improve equity in diagnosing historically marginalized patients.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Sandhu has consulted for Lexicon Pharmaceuticals and received research funding from Novartis. Dr Stafford serves as a medical advisor to Age Bold Inc, which is developing online programming for patients with heart failure. The other authors report no conflicts.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-3297
Volume :
17
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Heart failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38847082
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.010718