Back to Search
Start Over
Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III EVOKE-01 Study.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2024 Aug 20; Vol. 42 (24), pp. 2860-2872. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 31. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported.<br />Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (stratified by histology, best response to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen, and AGA treatment received or not) to SG (one 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel (one 75 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety.<br />Results: In the intention-to-treat population (SG, n = 299; docetaxel, n = 304), 55.4% had one previous line of therapy. Median follow-up was 12.7 months (range, 6.0-24.0). The primary end point was not met. There was a numerical OS improvement for SG versus docetaxel (median, 11.1 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.04]; one-sided P = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death.<br />Conclusion: Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Aged
Adult
Progression-Free Survival
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Immunoconjugates
Docetaxel therapeutic use
Docetaxel administration & dosage
Docetaxel adverse effects
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Lung Neoplasms mortality
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage
Camptothecin analogs & derivatives
Camptothecin therapeutic use
Camptothecin adverse effects
Camptothecin administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 42
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38843511
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00733