Back to Search Start Over

Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors :
Marchante M
Barrachina F
Piechota S
Fernandez-González M
Giovannini A
Smith T
Kats S
Paulsen B
González E
Calvente V
Silvan A
Abittan B
Klein J
Klatsky P
Ordonez D
Kramme CC
Source :
F&S science [F S Sci] 2024 Aug; Vol. 5 (3), pp. 242-251. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 03.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment.<br />Design: A retrospective survey study.<br />Setting: Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center.<br />Patient(s): Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600-800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800-2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023.<br />Intervention(s): Minimal and conventional COS treatments.<br />Main Outcome Measure(s): The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and χ <superscript>2</superscript> tests, with a significance level.<br />Result(s): During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment.<br />Conclusion(s): Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.M. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. M.M. is listed on a patent covering the use of ovarian support cells (OSCs) for in vitro maturation (IVM): US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. F.B. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. S.P. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. S.P. is listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. M.F.G. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. A.G. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. A.G. is listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. T.S. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. S.K. has nothing to disclose. B.P. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. B.P. is listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. E.G. has nothing to disclose. V.C. has nothing to disclose. A.S. has nothing to disclose. B.A. has nothing to disclose. J.K. has nothing to disclose. P.K. has nothing to disclose. D.O. has nothing to disclose. C.C.K. reported being a shareholder in Gameto Inc., a for-profit biotechnology company. C.C.K. is listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. C.C.K. is listed on three patents covering the use of OSCs for IVM: US Patent Application No. 17/846,725, US Patent Application No. 17/846,845, and International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/026012. C.C.K. is additionally listed on three patents for the transcription factor-directed production of granulosa-like cells from stem cells: International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/065140, US Provisional Application No. 63/326,640, and US. Provisional Application No. 63/444,108.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2666-335X
Volume :
5
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
F&S science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38838957
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002