Back to Search Start Over

Improving eSource Site Start-Up Practices.

Authors :
Cramer AE
King LS
Buckley MT
Casteleyn P
Ennis C
Hamidi M
Rodrigues GMC
Snyder DC
Vattikola A
Eisenstein EL
Source :
Research square [Res Sq] 2024 May 24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: eSource software that copies patient electronic health record data into a clinical trial electronic case report form holds promise for increasing data quality while reducing data collection, monitoring and source document verification costs. Integrating eSource into multicenter clinical trial start-up procedures could facilitate the use of eSource technologies in clinical trials.<br />Methods: We conducted a qualitative integrative analysis to identify eSource site start-up key steps, challenges that might occur in executing those steps, and potential solutions to those challenges. We then conducted a value analysis to determine the challenges and solutions with the greatest impacts for eSource implementation teams.<br />Results: There were 16 workshop participants: 10 pharmaceutical sponsor, 3 academic site, and 1 eSource vendor representatives. Participants identified 36 Site Start-Up Key Steps, 11 Site Start-Up Challenges, and 14 Site Start-Up Solutions for eSource-enabled studies. Participants also identified 77 potential impacts of the Challenges upon the Site Start-Up Key Steps and 70 ways in which the Solutions might impact Site Start-Up Challenges. The most important Challenges were: (1) not being able to identify a site eSource champion and (2) not agreeing on an eSource approach. The most important Solutions were: (1) vendors accepting electronic data in the FHIR standard, (2) creating standard content for eSource-related legal documents, and (3) creating a common eSource site readiness checklist.<br />Conclusions: Site start-up for eSource-enabled multi-center clinical trials is a complex socio-technical problem. This study's Start-Up Solutions provide a basic infrastructure for scalable eSource implementation.<br />Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT Amy E. Cramer: Employment, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine Linda S. King: Employment, Astellas Pharma Michael T. Buckley: Employment, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Peter Casteleyn: Employment, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine Cory Ennis: Employment: Duke University School of Medicine Muayad Hamidi: Employment: UT Health San Antonio Gonçalo M. C. Rodrigues: Employment, Janssen-Cilag Denise C. Snyder: Employment, Duke University School of Medicine Aruna Vattikola: Employment, Merck & Co Eric L. Eisenstein: I have nothing to declare Additional Declarations: Competing interest reported. Amy E. Cramer: Employment, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine Linda S. King: Employment, Astellas Pharma Michael T. Buckley: Employment, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Peter Casteleyn: Employment, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine Cory Ennis: Employment: Duke University School of Medicine Muayad Hamidi: Employment: UT Health San Antonio Gonçalo M. C. Rodrigues: Employment, Janssen-Cilag Denise C. Snyder: Employment, Duke University School of Medicine Aruna Vattikola: Employment, Merck & Co Eric L. Eisenstein: I have nothing to declare

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2693-5015
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Research square
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38826202
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4414917/v1