Back to Search Start Over

Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Oncology: Preliminary Insights From the Global ONCOTRUST-1 Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors :
El Bairi K
Najem S
Chowdhury AR
Omar A
Abdihamid O
Teuwen LA
Benhima N
Madariaga A
Elkefi S
Diaz FC
Hussain S
Jenei K
Hammad N
Mutebi M
Rubagumya F
Trapani D
El Kadmiri N
Laouali N
Fourtassi M
Source :
JCO global oncology [JCO Glob Oncol] 2024 May; Vol. 10, pp. e2400167.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Conflicts of interest (COIs) between oncologists and industry might considerably influence how the presentation of the research results is delivered, ultimately affecting clinical decisions and policy-making. Although there are many regulations on reporting COI in high-income countries (HICs), little is known about their reporting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Oncology Transparency Under Scrutiny and Tracking (ONCOTRUST-1) is a pilot global survey to explore the knowledge and perceptions of oncologists regarding COI.<br />Materials and Methods: We designed an online 27-question-based survey in the English language to explore the perceptions and knowledge of oncologists regarding COI, with an emphasis on LMICs. Descriptive statistics and the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines were used to report the findings.<br />Results: ONCOTRUST-1 surveyed 200 oncologists, 70.9% of them practicing in LMICs. Median age of the respondents was 36 (range, 26-84) years; 47.5% of them were women. Of the respondents, 40.5% reported weekly visits by pharmaceutical representatives to their institutions. Regarding oncologists' perceptions of COI that require disclosure, direct financial benefits, such as honoraria, ranked highest (58.5%), followed by gifts from pharmaceutical representatives (50%) and travel grants for attending conferences (44.5%). By contrast, personal or institutional research funding, sample drugs, consulting or advisory board, expert testimony, and food and beverage funded by pharmaceutical industry were less frequently considered as COI. Moreover, only 24% of surveyed oncologists could correctly categorize all situations representing a COI.<br />Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of clear guidelines, education, and transparency in reporting COI in oncology. This hypothesis-generating pilot survey provided the rationale for ONCOTRUST-2 study, which will compare perceptions of COI among oncologists in LMICs and HICs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2687-8941
Volume :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JCO global oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38822759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00167