Back to Search
Start Over
A decade of experience with 530 minimally invasive robotic hepatectomies from a single tertiary hepatobiliary center: analysis of short-term outcomes and oncologic survival.
- Source :
-
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [J Gastrointest Surg] 2024 Aug; Vol. 28 (8), pp. 1273-1282. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 29. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: This research is the first study in the United States to document more than a decade of experience with 530 patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy at a single high-volume institution.<br />Methods: With institutional review board approval, a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy from 2012 to January 2024 was reviewed. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD).<br />Results: Of the 530 robotic hepatectomies, 231 (44.0%) were minor resections, 133 (25.0%) were technically major resections, and 166 (31.0%) were major resections. The patients were aged 63.0 (61.0 ± 14.7) years with a body mass index of 28.0 (29.0 ± 7.9) kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> . Cirrhosis was present in 80 patients (19.0%), with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3.0 (3.0 ± 0.5) and a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 7.0 (8.0 ± 3.0). Of note, 280 patients (53.0%) had previous abdominal operations, and 44 patients (8%) had previous liver resections. The operative time was 233.0 (260.0 ± 130.7) minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 100.0 (165.0 ± 205.0) mL. Moreover, 353 patients (66%) had hepatectomies for neoplastic disease, and 500 patients (95%) had an R0 resection margin. The tumor size was 4.0 (5.0 ± 3.6) cm. The total 90-day postoperative complications were 45 (8%), of which 21 (4%) were classified as major complications (Clavien-Dindo score of >III). The length of stay was 3.0 (4.0 ± 3.7) days, and the 30-day readmission rate was 86 (16%). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82%, 65%, and 59% for colorectal liver metastases, 84%, 68%, and 60% for hepatocellular carcinoma, and 79%, 61%, and 50% for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, respectively.<br />Conclusion: After a decade of application and optimization at a high-volume institution, the robotic approach has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective approach to liver resection.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Middle Aged
Male
Female
Aged
Tertiary Care Centers
Treatment Outcome
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Survival Rate
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular surgery
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular pathology
Operative Time
Length of Stay statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Liver Cirrhosis
Robotic Surgical Procedures methods
Hepatectomy methods
Liver Neoplasms surgery
Liver Neoplasms mortality
Liver Neoplasms pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-4626
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38821208
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.030