Back to Search Start Over

MAVMET trial: maraviroc and/or metformin for metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease in adults with suppressed HIV.

Authors :
McCabe L
Burns JE
Latifoltojar A
Post FA
Fox J
Pool E
Waters A
Santana B
Garvey L
Johnson M
McGuinness I
Chouhan M
Edwards J
Goodman AL
Cooke G
Murphy C
Collaco-Moraes Y
Webb H
Gregory A
Mohamed F
Rauchenberger M
Ryder SD
Sandford C
Baker JV
Angus B
Boesecke C
Orkin C
Punwani S
Clark A
Gilson R
Dunn D
Pett SL
Source :
AIDS (London, England) [AIDS] 2024 Aug 01; Vol. 38 (10), pp. 1513-1522. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is over-represented in people with HIV (PWH). Maraviroc (MVC) and/or metformin (MET) may reduce MAFLD by influencing inflammatory pathways and fatty acid metabolism.<br />Design: Open-label, 48-week randomized trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design.<br />Setting: Multicenter HIV clinics.<br />Participants: Nondiabetic, virologically suppressed PLWH, aged at least 35 years, with confirmed/suspected MAFLD (≥1 biochemical/anthropometric/radiological/histological features).<br />Intervention: Adjunctive MVC; MET; MVC+MET vs. antiretroviral therapy (ART) alone.<br />Primary Outcome: Change in liver fat fraction (LFF) between baseline and week-48 using magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction (MR PDFF).<br />Results: Six sites enrolled 90 participants (93% male; 81% white; median age 52 [interquartile range, IQR 47-57] years) between March 19, 2018, and November 11, 2019. Seventy percent had imaging/biopsy and at least one 1 MAFLD criteria. The analysis included 82/90 with week-0 and week-48 scans. Median baseline MR PDFF was 8.9 (4.6-17.1); 40, 38, 8, and 14% had grade zero, one, two, and three steatosis, respectively. Mean LFF increased slightly between baseline and follow-up scans: 2.22% MVC, 1.26% MET, 0.81% MVC+MET, and 1.39% ART alone. Prolonged intervention exposure (delayed week-48 scans) exhibited greater increases in MR PDFF (estimated difference 4.23% [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 2.97-5.48], P  < 0.001). There were no differences in predicted change for any intervention compared to ART alone: MVC (-0.42% [95% CI -1.53 to 0.68, P  = 0.45]), MET (-0.62 [-1.81 to 0.56, P  = 0.30]), and MVC+MET (-1.04 [-2.74 to 0.65, P  = 0.23]). Steatosis grade remained unchanged in 55% and increased in 24%.<br />Conclusion: Baseline levels of liver fat were lower than predicted. Contrary to our hypothesis, neither MVC, MET, or the combination significantly reduced liver fat as measured by MRPDFF compared to ART alone.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-5571
Volume :
38
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
AIDS (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38819839
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003947