Back to Search Start Over

A Trial of Automated Outbreak Detection to Reduce Hospital Pathogen Spread.

Authors :
Baker MA
Septimus E
Kleinman K
Moody J
Sands KE
Varma N
Isaacs A
McLean LE
Coady MH
Blanchard EJ
Poland RE
Yokoe DS
Stelling J
Haffenreffer K
Clark A
Avery TR
Sljivo S
Weinstein RA
Smith KN
Carver B
Meador B
Lin MY
Lewis SS
Washington C
Bhattarai M
Shimelman L
Kulldorff M
Reddy SC
Jernigan JA
Perlin JB
Platt R
Huang SS
Source :
NEJM evidence [NEJM Evid] 2024 May; Vol. 3 (5), pp. EVIDoa2300342. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 23.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Detection and containment of hospital outbreaks currently depend on variable and personnel-intensive surveillance methods. Whether automated statistical surveillance for outbreaks of health care-associated pathogens allows earlier containment efforts that would reduce the size of outbreaks is unknown.<br />Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized trial in 82 community hospitals within a larger health care system. All hospitals followed an outbreak response protocol when outbreaks were detected by their infection prevention programs. Half of the hospitals additionally used statistical surveillance of microbiology data, which alerted infection prevention programs to outbreaks. Statistical surveillance was also applied to microbiology data from control hospitals without alerting their infection prevention programs. The primary outcome was the number of additional cases occurring after outbreak detection. Analyses assessed differences between the intervention period (July 2019 to January 2022) versus baseline period (February 2017 to January 2019) between randomized groups. A post hoc analysis separately assessed pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Covid-19 pandemic intervention periods.<br />Results: Real-time alerts did not significantly reduce the number of additional outbreak cases (intervention period versus baseline: statistical surveillance relative rate [RR]=1.41, control RR=1.81; difference-in-differences, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.52; P=0.46). Comparing only the prepandemic intervention with baseline periods, the statistical outbreak surveillance group was associated with a 64.1% reduction in additional cases (statistical surveillance RR=0.78, control RR=2.19; difference-in-differences, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.99). There was no similarly observed association between the pandemic versus baseline periods (statistical surveillance RR=1.56, control RR=1.66; difference-in-differences, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.92).<br />Conclusions: Automated detection of hospital outbreaks using statistical surveillance did not reduce overall outbreak size in the context of an ongoing pandemic. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04053075. Support for HCA Healthcare's participation in the study was provided in kind by HCA.).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2766-5526
Volume :
3
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
NEJM evidence
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38815164
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2300342