Back to Search Start Over

Impact of randomly assigned "pay-as-you-go" liquefied petroleum gas prices on energy use for cooking: Experimental pilot evidence from rural Rwanda.

Authors :
Witinok-Huber R
Keller KP
Abimana E
Ahishakiye C
Chang HH
L'Orange C
Manning DT
Mori R
Muhirwa EF
Muhongerwa L
Ntakirutimana T
Puzzolo E
Quinn C
Rosa G
Tanner K
Young BN
Zimmerle D
Kalisa E
Volckens J
Clark ML
Source :
Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative [Energy Sustain Dev] 2024 Jun; Vol. 80. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The disease burden related to air pollution from traditional solid-fuel cooking practices in low- and middle-income countries impacts millions of people globally. Although the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) fuel for cooking can meaningfully reduce household air pollution concentrations, major barriers, including affordability and accessibility, have limited widespread adoption. Using a randomized controlled trial, our objective was to evaluate the association between the cost and use of LPG among 23 rural Rwandan households. We provided a 2-burner LPG stove with accessories and incorporated a "pay-as-you-go" (PAYG) LPG service model that included fuel delivery. PAYG services remove the large up-front cost of cylinder refills by integrating "smart meter" technology that allows participants to pay in incremental amounts, as needed. We assigned three randomized discounted prices for LPG to each household at ~4-week intervals over a 12-week period. We modeled the relationship between randomized PAYG LPG price and use (standardized to monthly periods), analyzing effect modification by relative household wealth. A 1000 Rwandan Franc (about 1 USD at the time of the study) increase in LPG price/kg was associated with a 4.1 kg/month decrease in use (95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.7, -1.6; n=69 observations). Wealth modified this association; we observed a 9.7 kg/month reduction (95% CI: -14.8, -4.5) among wealthier households and a 2.5 kg/month reduction (95% CI: -5.3, 0.3) among lower-wealth households (p-interaction=0.01). The difference in price sensitivity was driven by higher LPG use among wealthier households at more heavily discounted prices; from an 80% to 10% discount, wealthy households used 17.5 to 5.3 kg/month and less wealthy households used 6.2 to 3.1 kg/month. Our pilot-level experimental evidence of PAYG LPG in a rural low-resource setting suggests that further exploration of subsidized pricing varied by household wealth is needed to ensure future policy initiatives can achieve targets without exacerbating inequities.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0973-0826
Volume :
80
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38799418
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101455