Cholesteatoma in the pediatric aerodigestive population.

Objectives: To report the prevalence of cholesteatoma and related comorbidities in pediatric aerodigestive patients requiring tracheostomy or airway reconstruction procedures. To use study findings to inform clinical management of these complex patients.
Methods: A repository of clinical data drawn from our institution's electronic medical records was queried to identify airway reconstruction (airway) and complex hospital control (control) patient cohorts. Retrospective chart review was then performed to investigate the occurrence of cholesteatoma and related pathologies in these patients, as well as clinical management.
Results: The prevalence of cholesteatoma in airway and control patients was 6/374 (1.60 %) and 35/30,565 (0.11 %), respectively. The relative risk of cholesteatoma diagnosis in airway patients was 14.01 (95 % CI 6.06-32.14). Airway patients were more likely than control patients to have pressure equalization tube history (relative risk 3.25, 95 % CI 2.73-3.82). Age at cholesteatoma diagnosis and first surgical intervention was younger in airway compared to control patients (5.43 vs. 8.33, p = 0.0182, and 6.07 vs. 8.82, p = 0.0236). However, time from diagnosis to intervention and extent of surgery were similar between the groups.
Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the prevalence of cholesteatoma in the pediatric aerodigestive population. The relative risk of cholesteatoma diagnosis was found to be 14 times higher in patients with tracheostomy or airway reconstruction history. Underlying eustachian tube and palatal dysfunction are likely contributing factors to the elevated risk. Additionally, cholesteatoma in this population was diagnosed and required surgical intervention at a younger age, which may suggest a more aggressive disease course. Providers should maintain a high degree of suspicion for cholesteatoma in this complex population.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)