Back to Search Start Over

Comparative analysis of primer sets for the assessment of clonality in feline lymphomas.

Authors :
Weyrich A
Hecht W
Köhler K
Herden C
Henrich M
Source :
Frontiers in veterinary science [Front Vet Sci] 2024 May 07; Vol. 11, pp. 1356330. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 07 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Lymphomas are among the most important and common malignant tumors in cats. Differentiating lymphomas from reactive lymphoid proliferations can be challenging, so additional tools such as clonality assessment by PCR are important in diagnosis finding. Several PCR assays have been developed to assess clonality in feline lymphomas. For T-cell lymphomas TRG (T-cell receptor gamma) genes are the preferred target whereas for B-cell lymphomas most primer sets target immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) genes. Here we compare commonly used diagnostic primer sets for the assessment of clonality in feline lymphomas under controlled conditions (i.e., identical sample set, PCR setup, amplicon detection system).<br />Methods: Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples from 31 feline T-cell lymphomas, 29 B-cell lymphomas, and 11 non-neoplastic controls were analyzed by PCR combined with capillary electrophoresis.<br />Results and Discussion: We show that the combination of the primer sets published by Weiss et al. and Mochizuki et al. provided the best results for T-cell clonality, i.e., correctly assigns most populations as clonal or polyclonal. For B-cell clonality, the combination of the primer sets by Mochizuki et al. and Rout et al. gave the best results when omitting the Kde gene rearrangement due to its low specificity. This study rigorously evaluated various primer sets under uniform experimental conditions to improve accuracy of lymphoma diagnostic and provides a recommendation for achieving the highest diagnostic precision in lymphoma clonality analysis.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Weyrich, Hecht, Köhler, Herden and Henrich.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2297-1769
Volume :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in veterinary science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38774911
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1356330