Validation of the Self-Reported Edmonton Frail Scale - Acute Care in Patients ≥ 65 Years Undergoing Surgery.

Background: Frailty is common in geriatric emergency surgery and associated with increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes. Frailty screening is challenging in emergency settings. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is a valid tool to screen for patients at high risk for poor postoperative outcomes. Recently, the EFS was modified to decrease dependence on staff to perform physical measures. This modification, the EFS-Acute Care (EFS-AC), has not been validated. We wish to assess the agreement between the EFS and the EFS-AC.
Study Design: We performed a prospective cohort study from 10/2021 - 10/2022 screening 688 patients ≥ 65 years with both the EFS and EFS-AC preoperatively. We assessed the ability of the EFS-AC to discriminate frailty identified by the EFS and compared the association of both scales with loss of independence (LOI), hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU admissions, and ICU LOS. Receiver Operator Curves were used to estimate the discriminatory thresholds for LOI.
Results: 688 patients with a median age 73 (IQR 68, 77) were enrolled. The EFS-AC was able to discriminate individuals' frailty status by the EFS with excellent agreement (AUC 0.971 [0.958, 0.983]). An EFS-AC threshold score of ≥ 6 points lead to 93.60% of individuals being correctly identified (77.87% sensitivity and 97.00% specificity). Both EFS and EFS-AC ≥ 6 were similarly associated with a higher risk for all clinical outcomes assessed and demonstrated similar ability to predict LOI.
Conclusions: The EFS-AC is a valid preoperative frailty screen, and due to its self-reported nature, can be administered in the acute care setting, during virtual visits, or through digital health apps. Real-time screening can assist with better understanding patient needs and lead to interventions to prevent poor hospital outcomes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: April Ehrlich reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Aging. Eduardo Biala Jr. reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Aging. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Conflicts of Interest: None