Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial.

Background: Individuals with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion are at increased risk of poor outcomes. Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase might improve outcomes in this population. We aimed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase over non-thrombolytic standard of care in patients with minor ischaemic stroke and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality.
Methods: In this multicentre, prospective, parallel group, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were included at 48 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the UK. Eligible patients with minor acute ischaemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 0-5) and intracranial occlusion or focal perfusion abnormality were enrolled within 12 h from stroke onset. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or non-thrombolytic standard of care (control). Primary outcome was a return to baseline functioning on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients randomly assigned to a treatment group and who did not withdraw consent to participate) assessed at 90 days. Safety outcomes were reported in the ITT population and included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02398656, and is closed to accrual.
Findings: The trial was stopped early for futility. Between April 27, 2015, and Jan 19, 2024, 886 patients were enrolled; 369 (42%) were female and 517 (58%) were male. 454 (51%) were assigned to control and 432 (49%) to intravenous tenecteplase. The primary outcome occurred in 338 (75%) of 452 patients in the control group and 309 (72%) of 432 in the tenecteplase group (risk ratio [RR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·04, p=0·29). More patients died in the tenecteplase group (20 deaths [5%]) than in the control group (five deaths [1%]; adjusted hazard ratio 3·8; 95% CI 1·4-10·2, p=0·0085). There were eight (2%) symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages in the tenecteplase group versus two (<1%) in the control group (RR 4·2; 95% CI 0·9-19·7, p=0·059).
Interpretation: There was no benefit and possible harm from treatment with intravenous tenecteplase. Patients with minor stroke and intracranial occlusion should not be routinely treated with intravenous thrombolysis.
Funding: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the British Heart Foundation.
Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SBC received grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) to complete the TEMPO-2 study. Boehringer Ingelheim provided off-the-shelf study drug (tenecteplase) for the study. JFA has received public research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science, the regional health department, the European Commission, and a private research grant from AstraZeneca. He has received consultant or speaker fees from Pfizer-BMS, Medtronic, and Amgen, and travel support from Daiichi-Sankyo. KSB reports speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. LC has received consulting or speakers fees from Roche. JF reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sankyo, and Daiichi. AG reports a grant from Microvention; speaker fees from Alexion, Biogen, and Servier Canada; and stock options for SnapDx and Collavidence. DG reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ipsen, and Eisai. MG reports grant funding from Medtronic and Cerenovus and consulting fees from Mentice, CSL Behring, MicroVention, and Medtronic. TSF participated in an advisory board for Roche. FL reports speaker fees and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. BKM has been paid honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. MM has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim for participation at an advisory board on the approval of tenecteplase for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. SOM has received speaker fees from Boehringer, Medtronic, Penumbra, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Servier, and Daiichi Sankyo. KWM reports grant funding from the BHF, and the Stroke Association; consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, IschaemaView; lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, IschaemaView, and Brainomix; and non-financial support (drug supply for ATTEST-2 trial) from Boehringer Ingelheim. MWP is on Boehringer Ingelheim Advisory Board for Metalyse in stroke. AP received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and travel support from AstraZeneca for attending a meeting. OMP-N has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. RS is part funded by the UCLH Biomedical Research Centre. DS reports an unrestricted educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. MIW reports sponsorship or financial assistance to support attendance at scientific meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo UK, and Bayer; honoraria for lectures given at education meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; and payment for participation in advisory panels from Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo UK. DJW is the Co-principal Investigator for Health Research Board of Ireland, Award–Improving Pathways for Acute Stroke and Rehabilitation. AYXY reports salary support from the HSFC. MDH reports grant funding from CIHR, HSFC, Alberta Innovates, and study drug from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from NoNo and Medtronic; consulting fees from Sun Pharma Brainsgate; and a DSMB member role on many stroke clinical trials.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)