Back to Search Start Over

The development and implementation of a low-cost mechanical ventilator in a low-middle-income country during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Unisabana-HERONS.

Authors :
Giraldo-Cadavid LF
Echeverry J
Varón-Vega F
Bastidas A
Ramírez-Jaime A
Cardona AF
Lopez Vega CJ
Serrano-Mayorca CC
Garay D
Rincón DN
Oliveros H
Ramírez IA
Garcia-Gallo E
Enciso-Prieto VA
Ibáñez-Prada ED
Camelo JC
Cucunubo L
Buitrago L
Paipa LA
Longas LC
Agudelo-Otálora LM
Porras Diaz NF
Rachid RR
Henao I RD
Pedraza S
Reyes LF
Source :
Heliyon [Heliyon] 2024 May 05; Vol. 10 (9), pp. e30671. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 05 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America generated the need to develop low-cost, fast-manufacturing mechanical ventilators. The Universidad de La Sabana and the Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana designed and manufactured the Unisabana-HERONS (USH) ventilator. Here, we present the preclinical and clinical study results to evaluate its effectiveness and safety characteristics in an animal model (Y orkshire Sow) and five patients with acute respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilatory support for 24 h.<br />Methods: The effectiveness and safety outcomes included maintaining arterial blood gases and pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2), respiratory pressures and volumes (during continuous monitoring) in the range of ARDS and lung-protective strategy goals, and the occurrence of barotrauma. A significance level of 0.05 was used for statistical tests. This clinical trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04497623) and approved by the ethics committee.<br />Results: Among patients treated with the Unisabana-HERONS, the most frequent causes of acute respiratory failure were pneumonia in 3/5 (60 %) and ARDS in 2/5 (40 %). During the treatment, the ventilatory parameters related to lung protection protocols were kept within the safety range, and vital signs and blood gas were stable. The percentage of time that the respiratory pressures or volumes were out of safety range were plateau pressure >30 cm H2O: 0.00 %; driving pressure >15 cm H2O: 0.06 %; mechanical power >15 J/min: 0.00 %; and Tidal volume >8 mL/kg: 0.00 %. There were no adverse events related to the ventilator. The usability questionnaire retrieved a median score for all items between 9 and 10 (best score: 10), indicating great ease of use.<br />Conclusion: The Unisabana-HERONS ventilator effectively provided adequate gas exchange and maintained the ventilatory parameters in the range of lung protection strategies in humans and an animal model. Furthermore, it is straightforward to use and is a low-cost medical device.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid reports administrative support, equipment, drugs, or supplies, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by 10.13039/501100010628Universidad de La Sabana.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-8440
Volume :
10
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heliyon
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38756610
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30671