Back to Search Start Over

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CHANCE2201): a target trial emulation study.

Authors :
Jin ZC
Chen JJ
Zhu XL
Duan XH
Xin YJ
Zhong BY
Chen JZ
Tie J
Zhu KS
Zhang L
Huang M
Piao MJ
Li X
Shi HB
Liu RB
Xu AB
Ji F
Wu JB
Shao GL
Li HL
Huang MS
Peng ZY
Ji JS
Yuan CW
Liu XF
Hu ZC
Yang WZ
Yin GW
Huang JH
Ge NJ
Qi X
Zhao Y
Zhou JW
Xu GH
Tu Q
Lin HL
Zhang YJ
Jiang H
Shao HB
Su YJ
Chen TS
Shi BQ
Zhou X
Zhao HT
Zhu HD
Ren ZG
Teng GJ
Source :
EClinicalMedicine [EClinicalMedicine] 2024 May 06; Vol. 72, pp. 102622. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 06 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unconfirmed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC.<br />Methods: This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included advanced HCC patients receiving either TACE with ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (TACE-ICI-VEGF) or only ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (ICI-VEGF) from January 2018 to December 2022. The study design followed the target trial emulation framework with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) to minimize biases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05332821.<br />Findings: Among 1244 patients included in the analysis, 802 (64.5%) patients received TACE-ICI-VEGF treatment, and 442 (35.5%) patients received ICI-VEGF treatment. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months and 20.6 months, respectively. Post-application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. TACE-ICI-VEGF group exhibited a significantly improved median OS (22.6 months [95% CI: 21.2-23.9] vs 15.9 months [14.9-17.8]; P < 0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.75]). Median PFS was also longer in TACE-ICI-VEGF group (9.9 months [9.1-10.6] vs 7.4 months [6.7-8.5]; P < 0.0001; aHR 0.74 [0.65-0.85]) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. A higher ORR was observed in TACE-ICI-VEGF group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (41.2% vs 22.9%, P < 0.0001; 47.3% vs 29.7%, P < 0.0001). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 178 patients (22.2%) in TACE-ICI-VEGF group and 80 patients (18.1%) in ICI-VEGF group.<br />Interpretation: This multicenter study supports the use of TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile.<br />Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Nanjing Life Health Science and Technology Project.<br />Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.<br /> (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2589-5370
Volume :
72
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EClinicalMedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38745965
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102622