Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.

Authors :
Meijers TA
Nap A
Aminian A
Schmitz T
Dens J
Teeuwen K
van Kuijk JP
van Wely M
Bataille Y
Kraaijeveld AO
Roolvink V
Dambrink JE
Gosselink ATM
Hermanides RS
Ottervanger JP
Tsilingiris I
van den Buijs DMF
van Royen N
van Leeuwen MAH
Source :
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology [EuroIntervention] 2024 Jul 15; Vol. 20 (14), pp. e876-e886. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 15.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasound-guided puncture is unclear.<br />Aims: We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation.<br />Methods: The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions.<br />Results: A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (≥7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopy-guided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32).<br />Conclusions: As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for large-bore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov identifier: NCT04837404.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1969-6213
Volume :
20
Issue :
14
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38742577
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089