Back to Search
Start Over
Overall survival benefit of androgen suppression in addition to dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: Nationwide real-world data indicates a shift in men that benefit.
- Source :
-
Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 42 (8), pp. 245.e9-245.e18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 08. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: To evaluate the real-world added value of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in addition to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer, in view of advances in radiotherapy and diagnostics.<br />Methods: All Dutch men diagnosed with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (defined as: ≥cT2c-T3b N0M0, PSA ≥20-50 ng/ml, and/or Gleason score ≥8 (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade ≥4)) from 2009 through 2019 and treated with EBRT with or without ADT were identified in the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Propensity scores were used to match (1:1) men that received ADT to men that did not receive ADT. Subsequently, OS was compared. Analyses were also stratified by number of high-risk features, 1 (either ≥cT2c, PSA >20 ng/ml or Gleason score ≥8) versus ≥2 (out of ≥cT2c, PSA >20 ng/ml and Gleason score ≥8).<br />Results: A total of 14,773 men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer were identified, 3,958 (27%) of which received EBRT alone. After matching, 3,427 men remained in both groups and baseline characteristics were well-balanced. After a median follow-up of 92 months, OS was better in men treated with EBRT and ADT compared to men treated with EBRT alone (10-year OS: 66.4% versus 61.8%; HR 0.88 [95%CI: 0.80-0.96]). There was no statistically significant difference in OS in the subgroup of men with only 1 high-risk feature (10-year OS 67.7% versus 64.9%; HR 0.95 [95%CI: 0.85-1.07]).<br />Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of men treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer with EBRT, an OS benefit of adding ADT was only observed in men with at least 2 high-risk features. These results suggest that improvements in diagnostics and treatment in recent decades have resulted in a stage shift of men benefiting from the addition of ADT to EBRT.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Aged
Middle Aged
Netherlands epidemiology
Survival Rate
Radiotherapy Dosage
Retrospective Studies
Combined Modality Therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy
Prostatic Neoplasms mortality
Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms drug therapy
Androgen Antagonists therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-2496
- Volume :
- 42
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Urologic oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38724349
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.013