Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of muramidase produced with Trichoderma reesei  DSM 32338 (Balancius™) for laying hens (DSM nutritional products).

Authors :
Bampidis V
Azimonti G
Bastos ML
Christensen H
Dusemund B
Durjava M
Kouba M
López-Alonso M
López Puente S
Marcon F
Mayo B
Pechová A
Petkova M
Ramos F
Villa RE
Woutersen R
Yurkov A
Anguita M
Innocenti ML
Pizzo F
Plaza DP
Pettenati E
Ortuño J
Source :
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority [EFSA J] 2024 May 08; Vol. 22 (5), pp. e8788. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 08 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of muramidase produced with Trichoderma reesei DSM 32338 (Balancius™) as a feed additive for laying hens. The additive is already authorised as a zootechnical additive (functional group: other zootechnical additives) for chickens, turkeys and minor poultry species for fattening or reared for breeding, and for weaned piglets. The enzyme is produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of Trichoderma reesei; viable cells of the production strain and its recombinant DNA were not detected in the additive. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the additive does not give rise to safety concerns regarding the genetic modification of the production strain. Based on the data available from a sub-chronic oral toxicity study, the Panel concluded that the additive is safe for laying hens at the maximum recommended level of 60,000 LSU(F) (muramidase activity units)/kg feed. The Panel also concluded that the additive is safe for the consumers and the environment. The liquid formulation of the additive is considered not irritant to the skin or eyes. The solid formulation of the additive is considered not irritant to the skin. The Panel cannot conclude on the potential of the additive (both formulations) to be a dermal sensitiser or on the potential of the solid formulation to be irritant to the eyes. Due to the proteinaceous nature, both forms of the additive should be considered respiratory sensitisers. The additive has the potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical additive for laying hens at 30,000 LSU(F)/kg feed.<br />Competing Interests: If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.<br /> (© 2024 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1831-4732
Volume :
22
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38720965
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8788