Back to Search Start Over

Sex and gender-based analysis and diversity metric reporting in acute care trials published in high-impact journals: a systematic review.

Authors :
Granton D
Rodrigues M
Raparelli V
Honarmand K
Agarwal A
Friedrich JO
Perna B
Spaggiari R
Fortunato V
Risdonne G
Kho M
VanderKaay S
Chaudhuri D
Gomez-Builes C
D'Aragon F
Wiseman D
Lau VI
Lin C
Reid J
Trivedi V
Prakash V
Belley-Cote E
Al Mandhari M
Thabane L
Pilote L
Burns KEA
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 May 07; Vol. 14 (5), pp. e081118. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To characterise sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and diversity metric reporting, representation of female/women participants in acute care trials and temporal changes in reporting before and after publication of the 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research guideline.<br />Design: Systematic review.<br />Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE for trials published in five leading medical journals in 2014, 2018 and 2020.<br />Study Selection: Trials that enrolled acutely ill adults, compared two or more interventions and reported at least one clinical outcome.<br />Data Abstraction and Synthesis: 4 reviewers screened citations and 22 reviewers abstracted data, in duplicate. We compared reporting differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiology trials.<br />Results: We included 88 trials (75 (85.2%) ICU and 13 (14.8%) cardiology) (n=111 428; 38 140 (34.2%) females/women). Of 23 (26.1%) trials that reported an SGBA, most used a forest plot (22 (95.7%)), were prespecified (21 (91.3%)) and reported a sex-by-intervention interaction with a significance test (19 (82.6%)). Discordant sex and gender terminology were found between headings and subheadings within baseline characteristics tables (17/32 (53.1%)) and between baseline characteristics tables and SGBA (4/23 (17.4%)). Only 25 acute care trials (28.4%) reported race or ethnicity. Participants were predominantly white (78.8%) and male/men (65.8%). No trial reported gendered-social factors. SGBA reporting and female/women representation did not improve temporally. Compared with ICU trials, cardiology trials reported significantly more SGBA (15/75 (20%) vs 8/13 (61.5%) p=0.005).<br />Conclusions: Acute care trials in leading medical journals infrequently included SGBA, female/women and non-white trial participants, reported race or ethnicity and never reported gender-related factors. Substantial opportunity exists to improve SGBA and diversity metric reporting and recruitment of female/women participants in acute care trials.<br />Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022282565.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/. EB-C has received investigator-initiated grant funding from Bayer, BMS-Pfizer and Roche Diagnostics and consulting honoraria from Trimedic Therapeutics, which were unrelated to the current work. JR is a co-methodologist on the Society of Critical Care Medicine Guideline Committee–End of Life Care in the ICU Guidelines. VP is a member of the Canadian Critical Care Society–Equity, Diversity, Decolonisation and Inclusion Committee. KEAB is President of the Canadian Critical Care Society and an Ex-officio member of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Executive Committee. There are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38719297
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081118