Back to Search Start Over

Cell-type specific inhibitory plasticity in subicular pyramidal cells.

Authors :
Guinet A
Grosser S
Özbay D
Behr J
Vida I
Source :
Frontiers in cellular neuroscience [Front Cell Neurosci] 2024 Apr 23; Vol. 18, pp. 1368627. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 23 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

The balance between excitation and inhibition is essential to the proper function of cortical circuits. To maintain this balance during dynamic network activity, modulation of the strength of inhibitory synapses is a central requirement. In this study, we aimed to characterize perisomatic inhibition and its plasticity onto pyramidal cells (PCs) in the subiculum, the main output region of the hippocampus. We performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from the two main functional PC types, burst (BS) and regular spiking (RS) neurons in acute rat hippocampal slices and applied two different extracellular high-frequency stimulation paradigms: non-associative (presynaptic stimulation only) and associative stimulation (concurrent pre-and postsynaptic stimulation) to induce plasticity. Our results revealed cell type-specific differences in the expression of inhibitory plasticity depending on the induction paradigm: While associative stimulation caused robust inhibitory plasticity in both cell types, non-associative stimulation produced long-term potentiation in RS, but not in BS PCs. Analysis of paired-pulse ratio, variance of IPSPs, and postsynaptic Ca2+ buffering indicated a dominant postsynaptic calcium-dependent signaling and expression of inhibitory plasticity in both PC types. This divergence in inhibitory plasticity complements a stronger inhibition and a higher intrinsic excitability in RS as compared to BS neurons, suggesting differential involvement of the two PC types during network activation and information processing in the subiculum.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Guinet, Grosser, Özbay, Behr and Vida.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1662-5102
Volume :
18
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38716238
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2024.1368627