Cite
Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
MLA
Ayati, Narjess, et al. “Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.” Cancer Imaging : The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, vol. 24, no. 1, May 2024, p. 57. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.
APA
Ayati, N., McIntosh, L., Buteau, J., Alipour, R., Pudis, M., Daw, N., Jackson, P., & Hofman, M. S. (2024). Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging : The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 24(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x
Chicago
Ayati, Narjess, Lachlan McIntosh, James Buteau, Ramin Alipour, Michal Pudis, Nicholas Daw, Price Jackson, and Michael S Hofman. 2024. “Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.” Cancer Imaging : The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society 24 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.