Back to Search Start Over

Estimation of contemporary effective population size in plant populations: Limitations of genomic datasets.

Authors :
Gargiulo R
Decroocq V
González-Martínez SC
Paz-Vinas I
Aury JM
Lesur Kupin I
Plomion C
Schmitt S
Scotti I
Heuertz M
Source :
Evolutionary applications [Evol Appl] 2024 May 03; Vol. 17 (5), pp. e13691. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 03 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Effective population size ( N <subscript>e</subscript> ) is a pivotal evolutionary parameter with crucial implications in conservation practice and policy. Genetic methods to estimate N <subscript>e</subscript> have been preferred over demographic methods because they rely on genetic data rather than time-consuming ecological monitoring. Methods based on linkage disequilibrium (LD), in particular, have become popular in conservation as they require a single sampling and provide estimates that refer to recent generations. A software program based on the LD method, GONE, looks particularly promising to estimate contemporary and recent-historical N <subscript>e</subscript> (up to 200 generations in the past). Genomic datasets from non-model species, especially plants, may present some constraints to the use of GONE, as linkage maps and reference genomes are seldom available, and SNP genotyping is usually based on reduced-representation methods. In this study, we use empirical datasets from four plant species to explore the limitations of plant genomic datasets when estimating N <subscript>e</subscript> using the algorithm implemented in GONE, in addition to exploring some typical biological limitations that may affect N <subscript>e</subscript> estimation using the LD method, such as the occurrence of population structure. We show how accuracy and precision of N <subscript>e</subscript> estimates potentially change with the following factors: occurrence of missing data, limited number of SNPs/individuals sampled, and lack of information about the location of SNPs on chromosomes, with the latter producing a significant bias, previously unexplored with empirical data. We finally compare the N <subscript>e</subscript> estimates obtained with GONE for the last generations with the contemporary N <subscript>e</subscript> estimates obtained with the programs currentNe and NeEstimator.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1752-4571
Volume :
17
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Evolutionary applications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38707994
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13691