Back to Search Start Over

Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Seyam SH
Aboelsuod MAA
Ahmed IMA
Hassan AE
Source :
Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation [Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim] 2024 May 03; Vol. 52 (2), pp. 60-67.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings.<br />Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 μg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> h <superscript>-1</superscript> ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 μg kg <superscript>-1</superscript> min <superscript>-1</superscript> in the PF group during the approximately 45-min colonoscopy.<br />Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1-T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6-T8 and T11-T12, as well as upon admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group.<br />Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.<br /> (©Copyright 2024 by the Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Association / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation is published by Galenos Publishing House.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2667-677X
Volume :
52
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38700107
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485