Back to Search Start Over

Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer Tissue.

Authors :
Schmidt C
Stöhr R
Dimitrova L
Beckmann MW
Rübner M
Fasching PA
Denkert C
Lehmann U
Vollbrecht C
Haller F
Hartmann A
Erber R
Source :
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD [J Mol Diagn] 2024 Jul; Vol. 26 (7), pp. 624-637. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 30.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement A.H. had an advisory role and received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Roche, Cepheid, Qiagen, Agilent, Diaceutics, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Jansen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Ipsen. R.E. has received honoraria from Roche, Eisai, Pfizer, BioNTech, Veracyte (PROCURE), Diaceutics, Mindpeak, AstraZeneca, MEDAC, and Novartis. The institution of A.H. and R.E. conducts research for AstraZeneca, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, NanoString Technologies, Biocartis, ZytoVision, Novartis, Cepheid, Mindpeak, MSD, Gilead, palleos healthcare, Owkin, and BioNTech. U.L. had an advisory role and received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Novartis, Servier, and ThermoFisher.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1943-7811
Volume :
26
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38697471
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003