Prenatal test cohort of a modified rat comparative thyroid assay adding brain thyroid hormone measurements and histology but lowering group size appears able to detect disruption by sodium phenobarbital.

The Comparative Thyroid Assay (CTA, USEPA) is a screening test for thyroid hormone (TH) disruption in peripheral blood of dams and offspring. Recently, we began investigating feasible improvements to the CTA by adding examination of offspring brain TH concentrations and brain histopathology. In addition, we hypothesize that the number of animals required could be reduced by 50 % while still maintaining sensitivity to characterize treatment related changes in THs. Previously, we showed that the prenatal test cohort of the modified CTA could detect 1000 ppm sodium phenobarbital (NaPB)-induced suppression of brain T3 (by 9 %) and T4 (by 33 %) with no significant changes in serum T3 and T4 (less than 8 %). In the current study we expanded the dose response in a prenatal test cohort. Pregnant SD rats (N = 10/group) were exposed to 0, 1000 or 1500 ppm NaPB in the diet from gestational days (GD) 6 to GD20. Serum THs concentrations in GD20 dams together with serum/brain THs concentrations and brain histopathology in the GD20 fetuses were examined. NaPB dose-dependently suppressed serum T3 (up to -26 %) and T4 (up to -44 %) in dams, with suppression of T3 in serum (up to -26 %) and brain (up to -18 %) and T4 in serum (up to -26 %) and brain (up to -29 %) of fetuses but without clear dose dependency. There were no remarkable findings that deviated significantly from controls in GD20 fetal brain by qualitative histopathology. Overall, the present study suggests that the prenatal test cohort of this modified CTA is able to detect the expected fetal TH disruptions by prenatal exposure to NaPB, while also reducing the number of animals used by 50 %, consistent with the results of our previous study. These findings add to the suggestion that lowering group sizes and adding endpoints may be a useful alternative to the original CTA design.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(© 2024 The Author(s).)