A modified intraventricular balloon method for functional assessment of hearts from donation after circulatory death.

Objective: Functional assessment of hearts during ex-vivo heart perfusion is not well-established. Conventional intraventricular balloon methods for large animals sacrifice the mitral valve. This study assessed the effectiveness of the modified intraventricular balloon method in comparison with other modalities used during working mode in juvenile pigs.
Methods: Following asphyxia circulatory arrest, hearts were ischemic for 15 minutes and then reperfused on an ex-vivo device for 2 hours before switching to working mode. Left ventricular pressure was continuously measured during reperfusion by a saline-filled balloon fixated in the left atrium. Spearman Correlation Coefficients with linear regression lines with confidence intervals were analyzed.
Results: Maximum dp/dt at 90 minutes of reperfusion and minimum dp/dt at 60 minutes of reperfusion showed a moderate positive correlation to that in working mode, respectively (Rs = 0.61, P  = .04 and Rs = 0.60, P  = .04). At 60 minutes of reperfusion, minimum dp/dt showed moderate positive correlation to tau (Rs = 0.52, P  = .08). Myocardial oxygen consumption during reperfusion consistently decreased at least 30% compared to working mode (at 90 minutes as the highest during reperfusion, 3.3 ± 0.8; in working mode, 5.6 ± 1.4, mLO ₂ /min/100 g, P  < .001).
Conclusions: Functional parameters of contractility and relaxation measured during reperfusion by the modified balloon method showed significant correlations to respective parameters in working mode. This mitral valve sparing technique can be used to predict viability and ventricular function in the early phase of ex-vivo heart perfusion without loading the heart during working mode.
Competing Interests: The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
(© 2024 The Author(s).)