Load-bearing capacity of 3D-printed incisor partial-coverage crowns made from zirconia and composite.

Purpose: This study investigated the fracture resistance of 0.5-mm-thick restorations for minimally invasive therapy. Anterior partial-coverage crowns composed of three-dimensional (3D)-printed 3-mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP; Lithacon 3Y210, Lithoz) and 3D-printed composite (Varseo Smile Crown plus, Bego) were compared with a control group made from milled 3Y-TZP (Cercon ht, DentsplySirona).
Methods: Three groups each with 27 restorations were produced. For milled 3Y-TZP partial-coverage crowns, drill compensation was needed so the milling bur could access the inner surface at the incisal edge. Restoration fit was verified by cross-sectioning 12 specimens in each group. The remaining 15 restorations were sandblasted (Al2O3, 0.1 MPa) and adhesively cemented (Panavia SA, Kuraray) onto CoCr teeth. Static load-to-failure tests were performed. The load was induced on the incisal edge. The forces needed to fracture the specimens were analyzed using the Welch analysis of variance and post hoc Dunnet-T3 tests. The Weibull parameters were also calculated.
Results: Drill compensation increased cement thickness at the loading area by 200 µm in milled 3Y-TZP restorations compared with the 3D-printed partial-coverage crowns. Fracture resistance was the highest in 3D-printed 3Y-TZP restorations (1570±661N) followed by milled 3Y-TZP (886±164N) and 3D-printed composite partial-coverage crowns (570±233 N). Milled 3Y-TZP was associated with a substantially higher Weibull modulus (m=6) than the 3D-printed materials (m=2), suggesting greater reliability.
Conclusions: Fracture resistance increased with tighter fit, demonstrating the benefit of the geometric freedom associated with 3D-printing. Future research should focus on making 3D-printed 3Y-TZP more reliable to increase its safety in clinical use.