Back to Search Start Over

DEep LearnIng-based QuaNtification of epicardial adipose tissue predicts MACE in patients undergoing stress CMR.

Authors :
Guglielmo M
Penso M
Carerj ML
Giacari CM
Volpe A
Fusini L
Baggiano A
Mushtaq S
Annoni A
Cannata F
Cilia F
Del Torto A
Fazzari F
Formenti A
Frappampina A
Gripari P
Junod D
Mancini ME
Mantegazza V
Maragna R
Marchetti F
Mastroiacovo G
Pirola S
Tassetti L
Baessato F
Corino V
Guaricci AI
Rabbat MG
Rossi A
Rovera C
Costantini P
van der Bilt I
van der Harst P
Fontana M
Caiani EG
Pepi M
Pontone G
Source :
Atherosclerosis [Atherosclerosis] 2024 Oct; Vol. 397, pp. 117549. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 18.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aims: This study investigated the additional prognostic value of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.<br />Methods: 730 consecutive patients [mean age: 63 ± 10 years; 616 men] who underwent stress CMR for known or suspected coronary artery disease were randomly divided into derivation (n = 365) and validation (n = 365) cohorts. MACE was defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiac deaths. A deep learning algorithm was developed and trained to quantify EAT volume from CMR. EAT volume was adjusted for height (EAT volume index). A composite CMR-based risk score by Cox analysis of the risk of MACE was created.<br />Results: In the derivation cohort, 32 patients (8.7 %) developed MACE during a follow-up of 2103 days. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35 % (HR 4.407 [95 % CI 1.903-10.202]; p<0.001), stress perfusion defect (HR 3.550 [95 % CI 1.765-7.138]; p<0.001), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (HR 4.428 [95%CI 1.822-10.759]; p = 0.001) and EAT volume index (HR 1.082 [95 % CI 1.045-1.120]; p<0.001) were independent predictors of MACE. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, adding EAT volume index to a composite risk score including LVEF, stress perfusion defect and LGE provided additional value in MACE prediction, with a net reclassification improvement of 0.683 (95%CI, 0.336-1.03; p<0.001). The combined evaluation of risk score and EAT volume index showed a higher Harrel C statistic as compared to risk score (0.85 vs. 0.76; p<0.001) and EAT volume index alone (0.85 vs.0.74; p<0.001). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort.<br />Conclusions: In patients with clinically indicated stress CMR, fully automated EAT volume measured by deep learning can provide additional prognostic information on top of standard clinical and imaging parameters.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Gianluca Pontone reports a relationship with G.E. Healthcare, Bracco, Heartflow, Boheringher that includes: funding grants and speaking and lecture fees. The other authors have nothing to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1484
Volume :
397
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Atherosclerosis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38679562
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117549