The application value of cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulin in tuberculous meningitis.

This article aims to study the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immunoglobulin in differential diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). The clinical data of 65 patients with TBM in our hospital were collected, and 65 patients with cryptococcal meningitis (CM) were enrolled in 1:1 matching. Relevant data were collected for comparison. CSFs IgG [331.51 (164.85, 645.00) vs 129.00 (55.05, 251.00) ng/mL], IgM [22.38 (8.52, 40.18) vs 6.08 (2.19, 23.30) ng/mL], and IgA [64.11 (21.44, 115.48) vs 16.55 (4.76, 30.36) ng/mL] in the TBM group were higher than those in the CM group ( P < 0.001). In the TBM group, after 24 weeks of treatment, the CSFs IgG, IgM, and IgA were significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). The predictive results of CSF immunoglobulin for TBM showed that IgG, IgM, and IgA all had some predictive value for TBM, and the combined predictive value of the three was the highest, with an area under the curve of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.774-0.881). Logistic regression analysis of CSF immunoglobulins and TBM prognosis showed that IgG [odds ratio (OR) = 4.796, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.575-8.864], IgM (OR = 3.456, 95% CI: 2.757-5.754), and IgA (OR = 4.371, 95% CI: 2.731-5.856) were TBM risk factors for poor prognosis in patients. The levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA in CSF were positively correlated with the severity of cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in TBM patients ( R ² = 0.542, F = 65.392, P < 0.05). CSFs IgG, IgM, and IgA can be used as a routine monitoring index for TBM patients, which has a certain reference value in differential diagnosis and efficacy evaluation.
Importance: In clinical practice, physicians can determine the physical conditions of patients based on the levels of cerebrospinal fluids (CSFs) IgG, IgM, and IgA. Higher levels of CSFs IgG, IgM, and IgA suggest more possibility of tuberculous meningitis and worse prognosis and magnetic resonance imaging manifestations.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.