Back to Search
Start Over
Incidence and clinical progression of asymptomatic peripherally inserted central catheter - related thrombosis in solid neoplasm patients: ultrasound insights from a prospective cohort study.
- Source :
-
Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis [Res Pract Thromb Haemost] 2024 Mar 27; Vol. 8 (3), pp. 102391. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 27 (Print Publication: 2024). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Managing central venous catheters in patients with neoplasms is challenging, and peripherally inserted central catheter PORT (PICC-PORT) has emerged as a promising option for safety and efficacy. However, understanding the clinical progression of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients with central venous catheters remains limited, especially in certain neoplasm types associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis.<br />Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided management in detecting and treating asymptomatic CRT in cancer patients with PICC.<br />Methods: In this prospective cohort study of 120 patients with solid neoplasms receiving chemotherapy, we investigated the incidence of isolated upper-extremity superficial vein thrombosis, upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis, and fibrin sheath formation through ultrasound follow-up at 30 and 90 days after catheter insertion. We analyzed risk factors associated with CRT and compared incidence rates between PICC-PORT and traditional PICC.<br />Results: Among the cohort, 69 patients (57.5%) had high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm, and 31 cases (25.8%) of CRT were observed, mostly within 30 days, with only 7 cases (22.6%) showing symptoms. Traditional PICC use (odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.14-30) and high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm (odds ratio, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.26-15.81) were identified as independent risk factors for CRT.<br />Conclusion: The majority of CRT present asymptomatically within the first 30 days of venous catheter insertion in patients with solid neoplasms. Ultrasound follow-up is valuable for detecting asymptomatic CRT. The risk of CRT was lower with PICC-PORT than with PICC. Additionally, the risk of CRT was found to be higher in patients with high-risk thromboembolic neoplasms. It is crucial for larger studies to confirm the utility of treating asymptomatic thromboses and isolated superficial thrombosis.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2475-0379
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38660454
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102391