Back to Search Start Over

Willingness and preferences for long-acting injectable PrEP among US men who have sex with men: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors :
Cole SW
Glick JL
Campoamor NB
Sanchez TH
Sarkar S
Vannappagari V
Rinehart A
Rawlings K
Sullivan PS
Bridges JFP
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Apr 22; Vol. 14 (4), pp. e083837. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 22.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) was shown to be safe and effective in multiple clinical trials. Increasing uptake and persistence among populations with elevated risk for HIV acquisition, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM), is critical to HIV prevention.<br />Objective: This analysis aims to understand potential users' preferences for LA-PrEP, with audience segmentation.<br />Design: Willingness to use and preferences for LA-PrEP were measured in HIV-negative, sexually active MSM in the 2020 American Men's Internet Survey. Respondents answered a discrete choice experiment with paired profiles of hypothetical LA-PrEP characteristics with an opt-out option (no LA-PrEP). Conditional and mixed logit models were run; the final model was a dummy-coded mixed logit that interacted with the opt-out.<br />Setting: US national online sample.<br />Results: Among 2506 MSM respondents, most (75%) indicated a willingness to use LA-PrEP versus daily oral PrEP versus no PrEP. Respondents were averse to side effects and increasing costs and preferred increasing levels of protection. Respondents preferred a 2-hour time to obtain LA-PrEP vs 1 hour, with a strong aversion to 3 hours. Overall, there was an aversion to opting out of LA-PrEP, with variations: those with only one partner, no/other insurance or who were Black, Indigenous or People of Colour were significantly less likely to prefer LA-PrEP, while those who were Hispanic/Latino, college educated and <40 years significantly preferred LA-PrEP.<br />Conclusions: A large proportion of MSM expressed a preference for LA-PrEP over daily oral pills. Most respondents chose LA-PrEP regardless of cost, clinic time, side effects or protection level; however, preferences varied by sociodemographics. These varied groups likely require tailored intervention strategies to achieve maximum LA-PrEP uptake and persistence.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: JG and Johns Hopkins University and THS and PSS and Emory University receive grant funding from ViiV Healthcare to conduct pre-exposure prophylaxis-related research. JFPB holds an Innovation in Regulatory Science Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
14
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38653510
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083837