Back to Search Start Over

Flow cytometric minimal residual disease measurement accounting for cytogenetics in children with non-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated according to the ALL-MB 2008 protocol.

Authors :
Popov A
Henze G
Tsaur G
Budanov O
Roumiantseva J
Belevtsev M
Verzhbitskaya T
Movchan L
Lagoyko S
Zharikova L
Olshanskaya Y
Riger T
Valochnik A
Miakova N
Litvinov D
Khlebnikova O
Streneva O
Stolyarova E
Ponomareva N
Novichkova G
Aleinikova O
Fechina L
Karachunskiy A
Source :
Cancer medicine [Cancer Med] 2024 Apr; Vol. 13 (8), pp. e7172.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Quantitative measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) is the "gold standard" for estimating the response to therapy in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Nevertheless, the speed of the MRD response differs for different cytogenetic subgroups. Here we present results of MRD measurement in children with BCP-ALL, in terms of genetic subgroups with relation to clinically defined risk groups.<br />Methods: A total of 485 children with non-high-risk BCP-ALL with available cytogenetic data and MRD studied at the end-of-induction (EOI) by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) were included. All patients were treated with standard-risk (SR) of intermediate-risk (ImR) regimens of "ALL-MB 2008" reduced-intensity protocol.<br />Results and Discussion: Among all study group patients, 203 were found to have low-risk cytogenetics (ETV6::RUNX1 or high hyperdiploidy), while remaining 282 children were classified in intermediate cytogenetic risk group. For the patients with favorable and intermediate risk cytogenetics, the most significant thresholds for MFC-MRD values were different: 0.03% and 0.04% respectively. Nevertheless, the most meaningful thresholds were different for clinically defined SR and ImR groups. For the SR group, irrespective to presence/absence of favorable genetic lesions, MFC-MRD threshold of 0.1% was the most clinically valuable, although for ImR group the most informative thresholds were different in patients from low-(0.03%) and intermediate (0.01%) cytogenetic risk groups.<br />Conclusion: Our data show that combining clinical risk factors with MFC-MRD measurement is the most useful tool for risk group stratification of children with BCP-ALL in the reduced-intensity protocols. However, this algorithm can be supplemented with cytogenetic data for part of the ImR group.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-7634
Volume :
13
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38651186
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7172