Back to Search Start Over

Differences in glycemic trends due to reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy from the perspective of continuous glucose-monitoring.

Authors :
Shoda K
Kubota T
Kawaguchi Y
Akaike H
Maruyama S
Higuchi Y
Nakayama T
Saito R
Takiguchi K
Furuya S
Shiraishi K
Amemiya H
Kawaida H
Ichikawa D
Source :
Surgery today [Surg Today] 2024 Sep; Vol. 54 (9), pp. 1104-1111. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 23.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: In recent years, clinicians have focused on the importance of preventing hypoglycemia. We evaluated the impact of different reconstruction procedures after proximal gastrectomy on glycemic variability in non-diabetic patients with gastric cancer.<br />Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2023. Flash continuous glucose-monitoring, a novel method for assessing glycemic control, was used to evaluate the glycemic profiles after gastrectomy. A flash continuous glucose-monitoring sensor was placed subcutaneously at the time of discharge, and glucose trends were evaluated for 2 weeks.<br />Results: The anastomotic methods for proximal gastrectomy were esophagogastrostomy in 10 patients and double-tract reconstruction in 10 patients. The time below this range (glucose levels < 70 mg/dL) was significantly higher in the double-tract reconstruction group than in the esophagogastrostomy group (p = 0.049). A higher nocturnal time below this range was significantly correlated with an older age and double-tract reconstruction (p = 0.025 and p = 0.025, respectively).<br />Conclusion: These findings provide new insights into reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy by assessing postoperative hypoglycemia in non-diabetic patients with gastric cancer.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1436-2813
Volume :
54
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgery today
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38649530
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02845-7