Back to Search Start Over

Episodic memory assessment: effects of sex and age on performance and response time during a continuous recognition task.

Authors :
Clifford JO Jr
Anand S
Tarpin-Bernard F
Bergeron MF
Ashford CB
Bayley PJ
Ashford JW
Source :
Frontiers in human neuroscience [Front Hum Neurosci] 2024 Apr 04; Vol. 18, pp. 1304221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 04 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous recognition tasks (CRTs) assess episodic memory (EM), the central functional disturbance in Alzheimer's disease and several related disorders. The online MemTrax computerized CRT provides a platform for screening and assessment that is engaging and can be repeated frequently. MemTrax presents complex visual stimuli, which require complex involvement of the lateral and medial temporal lobes and can be completed in less than 2 min. Results include number of correct recognitions (HITs), recognition failures (MISSes = 1-HITs), correct rejections (CRs), false alarms (FAs = 1-CRs), total correct (TC = HITs + CRs), and response times (RTs) for each HIT and FA. Prior analyses of MemTrax CRT data show no effects of sex but an effect of age on performance. The number of HITs corresponds to faster RT-HITs more closely than TC, and CRs do not relate to RT-HITs. RT-HITs show a typical skewed distribution, and cumulative RT-HITs fit a negative survival curve (RevEx). Thus, this study aimed to define precisely the effects of sex and age on HITS, CRs, RT-HITs, and the dynamics of RTs in an engaged population.<br />Methods: MemTrax CRT online data on 18,255 individuals was analyzed for sex, age, and distributions of HITs, CRs, MISSes, FAs, TC, and relationships to both RT-HITs and RT-FAs.<br />Results: HITs corresponded more closely to RT-HITs than did TC because CRs did not relate to RT-HITs. RT-FAs had a broader distribution than RT-HITs and were faster than RT-HITs in about half of the sample, slower in the other half. Performance metrics for men and women were the same. HITs declined with age as RT-HITs increased. CRs also decreased with age and RT-FAs increased, but with no correlation. The group over aged 50 years had RT-HITs distributions slower than under 50 years. For both age ranges, the RevEx model explained more than 99% of the variance in RT-HITs.<br />Discussion: The dichotomy of HITs and CRs suggests opposing cognitive strategies: (1) less certainty about recognitions, in association with slower RT-HITs and lower HIT percentages suggests recognition difficulty, leading to more MISSes, and (2) decreased CRs (more FAs) but faster RTs to HITs and FAs, suggesting overly quick decisions leading to errors. MemTrax CRT performance provides an indication of EM (HITs and RT-HITs may relate to function of the temporal lobe), executive function (FAs may relate to function of the frontal lobe), processing speed (RTs), cognitive ability, and age-related changes. This CRT provides potential clinical screening utility for early Alzheimer's disease and other conditions affecting EM, other cognitive functions, and more accurate impairment assessment to track changes over time.<br />Competing Interests: CA is the Owner of MemTrax, LLC, which provided the MemTrax online test to the French company, HAPPYneuron, Inc., which administered the test as part of a battery of tests to evaluate and improve cognitive function and was employed by CogniFit, LLC. FT-B was employed by HAPPYneuron, Inc. during the time the data on MemTrax was collected. JA has been an informal adviser to MemTrax, LLC and owns the MemTrax website. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Clifford, Anand, Tarpin-Bernard, Bergeron, Ashford, Bayley and Ashford.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1662-5161
Volume :
18
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in human neuroscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38638807
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1304221