Back to Search Start Over

The Impact of Preprocedural Platelet Function Testing on Periprocedural Complication Rates Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion: An International Multicenter Study.

Authors :
Vranic JE
Dmytriw AA
Berglar IK
Alotaibi NM
Cancelliere NM
Stapleton CJ
Rabinov JD
Harker P
Gupta R
Bernstock JD
Koch MJ
Raymond SB
Mascitelli JR
Patterson TT
Seinfeld J
White A
Case D
Roark C
Gandhi CD
Al-Mufti F
Cooper J
Matouk C
Sujijantarat N
Devia DA
Ocampo-Navia MI
Villamizar-Torres DE
Puentes JC
Salem MM
Baig A
El Namaani K
Kühn AL
Pukenas B
Jankowitz BT
Burkhardt JK
Siddiqui A
Jabbour P
Singh J
Puri AS
Regenhardt RW
Mendes Pereira V
Patel AB
Source :
Neurosurgery [Neurosurgery] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 95 (1), pp. 179-185. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 18.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using pipeline embolization device (PED). We aimed to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel.<br />Methods: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT before treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72 h of embolization were identified. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non-PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or χ 2 tests. A P -value <.05 was statistically significant.<br />Results: 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non-PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel nonresponders requiring changes in their pre-embolization DAPT regimen. Five percentage of PFT group [2.8%, 8.5%] patients experienced thromboembolic complications vs 1.6% of patients in the non-PFT group [0.6%, 3.8%] ( P = .019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability vs 4 (80%) non-PFT group patients. 3.7% of PFT group patients [1.5%, 8.2%] and 3.5% [1.8%, 6.3%] of non-PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications ( P > .9).<br />Conclusion: Preprocedural PFT before PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients premedicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure-related intracranial complications.<br /> (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4040
Volume :
95
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurosurgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38634693
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002956