Back to Search Start Over

Pragmatic Trial of Messaging to Providers About Treatment of Hyperlipidemia (PROMPT-LIPID): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Shah NN
Ghazi L
Yamamoto Y
Kumar S
Martin M
Simonov M
Riello Iii RJ
Faridi KF
Ahmad T
Wilson FP
Desai NR
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes [Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes] 2024 May; Vol. 17 (5), pp. e010335. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 18.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is underutilized for very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. PROMPT-LIPID (PRagmatic Trial of Messaging to Providers about Treatment of HyperLIPIDemia) sought to determine whether electronic health record (EHR) alerts improve 90-day LLT intensification in patients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.<br />Methods: PROMPT-LIPID was a pragmatic trial in which cardiovascular and internal medicine clinicians within Yale New Haven Health (New Haven, CT) were cluster-randomized to receive an EHR alert with individualized LLT recommendations or no alert for outpatients with very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), ≥70 mg/dL. The primary outcome was 90-day LLT intensification (change to high-intensity statin and addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9i [proprotein subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors]). Secondary outcomes included LDL-C level, proportion of patients with LDL-C of <70 or < 55 mg/dL, rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, ED visit incidence, and 6-month mortality. Results were analyzed using logistic and linear regression clustered at the provider level.<br />Results: The no-alert group included 47 clinicians and 1370 patients (median age, 71 years; 50.1% female, median LDL-C, 93 mg/dL); the alert group included 49 clinicians and 1130 patients (median age, 72 years; 47% female, median LDL-C 91, mg/dL). The primary outcome was observed in 14.1% of patients in the alert group as compared with 10.4% in the no-alert group. There were no differences in any secondary outcomes at 6 months. Among 542 patients whose clinicians (n=46) did not dismiss the EHR alert recommendations, LLT intensification was significantly greater (21.2% versus 10.4%, odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.48-3.66]).<br />Conclusions: With a real-time, targeted, individualized EHR alert as compared with usual care, the proportion of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with LLT intensification was numerically higher but not statistically significant. Among clinicians who did not dismiss the alert, there was a > 2-fold increase in LLT intensification. EHR alerts, coupled with strategies to reduce clinician dismissal, may help address persistent gaps in LDL-C management.<br />Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04394715, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04394715.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Desai receives support from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to develop and maintain performance measures that are used for public reporting and payment programs; receives research support from and provides consulting for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Novartis, SC Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor; and serves on the medical review committee for Anthem. R.J. Riello is a consultant for Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, PhaseBio, and Portola. The other authors report no conflicts.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-7705
Volume :
17
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38634282
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010335