Back to Search Start Over

Aortic root morphometry revisited-Clinical implications for aortic valve interventions.

Authors :
Dudkiewicz D
Lis M
Yakovliev A
Hołda J
Bolechała F
Strona M
Kopacz P
Hołda MK
Source :
Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) [Clin Anat] 2024 Apr 17. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 17.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

The complex anatomy of the aortic root is of great importance for many surgical and transcatheter cardiac procedures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive morphological description of the nondiseased aortic root. We morphometrically examined 200 autopsied human adult hearts (22.0% females, 47.9 ± 17.7 years). A meticulous macroscopic analysis of aortic root anatomy was performed. The largest cross-section area of the aortic root was observed in coaptation center plane (653.9 ± 196.5 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ), followed by tubular plane (427.7 ± 168.0 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ) and basal ring (362.7 ± 159.1 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ) (p < 0.001). The right coronary sinus was the largest (area: 234.3 ± 85.0 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ), followed by noncoronary sinus (218.7 ± 74.8 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ) and left coronary sinus (201.2 ± 78.08 mm <superscript>2</superscript> ). The noncoronary sinus was the deepest, followed by right and left coronary sinus (16.4 ± 3.2 vs. 15.9 ± 3.1 vs. 14.9 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001). In 68.5% of hearts, the coaptation center was located near the aortic geometric center. The left coronary ostium was located 15.6 ± 3.8 mm above sinus bottom (within the sinus in 91.5% and above sinutubular junction in 8.5%), while for right coronary ostium, it was 16.2 ± 3.5 mm above (83.5% within sinus and 16.5% above). In general, males exhibited larger aortic valve dimensions than females. A multiple forward stepwise regression model showed that anthropometric variables might predict the size of coaptation center plane (age, sex, and heart weight; R <superscript>2</superscript>  = 31.8%), tubular plane (age and sex; R <superscript>2</superscript>  = 25.6%), and basal ring (age and sex; R <superscript>2</superscript>  = 16.9%). In conclusion, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of aortic-root morphometry and provides a platform for further research into the intricate interplay between structure and function of the aortic root.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1098-2353
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38630034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24165